Ich würde nicht darüber stolpern, "to feature" bedeutet auch "vorkommen". Ist "to feature" das Problem?

Ich würde eher davon ausgehen, dass "any more" (2 words) das Problem ist. Such mal mit zwei Worten oder mit "no longer features".

There’s no problem at all with the verb “feature” being used intransitively in this sense. The question of “anymore” vs. “any more,” as well as alternative formulations such as “no longer features,” are certainly worth bearing in mind.

What strikes me as likely being relatively uncommon though is the case where a sentence literally ends with “feature anymore.” (as you signify with your periods placed within inverted commas). More common will be cases like “ … doesn’t feature in the series anymore,” although in writing I’d likely prefer the alternative “ … no longer features in the series.”

P.S. Written before seeing penguin's edit on "no longer."

In deinem Satz hätte ich "occur" statt "feature" erwartet.

Yes. Or "take place."

There are other oddities in that article: “the burning of live chicks was made to prevent, etc.,” “the importation of the chicks,” “President Hassan did not delve much into the saga,” to pick out just three of them.

Danke schön, dann war mein skeptisches Gefühl in diesem Fall nicht völlig unbegründet.

edit